Thursday, August 30, 2018

Review of Pro Solar Hawaii Court Case

Lets get going with this Review of Pro Solar Hawaii court case post. The shortest funniest way to do this is to say that they got their derriere handed to them gift wrapped today. I'd say there is a tear that was shed today.
Review of Pro Solar Hawaii Court Case

Well now, what a special day in court! Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii I'm going to guess is not happy at all after todays court hearing.  There appeared to be extra squirming on his (Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii ) part before and after the Judge made their case against me twice as hard and i would guess twice as expensive for them.

If you have followed my blog as I keep it updated as to what happens as I deal with what i see as the worst solar contractor company on the Big Island of Hawaii, Pro Solar Hawaii.  You know in the case of Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii  vs. Me, I had left off where I filed motions with the court (Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii lawsuit update 2.0).   One was the "Motion of Defendant to Strike References to Matters Covered by Rule 408." This goes to Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii's claim that my offers of settlement were nothing but an attempt to extort money from them.  Funny thing is that as of today, my first settlement offer would have been cheaper for Pro Solar Hawaii than the amount it's going to be after this and upcoming cases will be in total.  LOL!

Today his Honorable Judge approved my "Motion to Strike References to Matters Covered by Rule 408" -- my settlement offer made at the request of Pro Solar Hawaii.  I'm not a big city lawyer. Nor do I play one on TV. But i am going to go out on a limb and say the part of their lawsuit where they claim "blackmail and extortion" is now out for good.  It was silly for Pro Solar Hawaii to even try.  Although, I do find that they did all kinds of silly things when I hired them. See my post - Pro Solar Hawaii does not know how to read an architect plan I think.

The next beauty handed to Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii is that my "Motion of Defendant to Dismiss Amended Complaint for Failure to Join Necessary Party" produced an order by his Honorable Judge that to be able to sue me, they have to also sue the Better Business Bureau.  By claiming that Thomas Paddock, CEO of Sound Research Corporation, decided not to do business with him based on what the Better Business Bureau posted to their website. The Judge says that the BBB must be sued with me. This is not going to be an easy task for Pro Solar Hawaii. One can easily see that to sue the BBB is going to cost a lot of money. Not only in filing costs, service, etc., but the BBB I'd say are going to call in the big guns from Honolulu. This makes me especially giddy as now I will know exactly why Pro Solar Hawaii lost its BBB accreditation, and that I  had been lied to by Pro Solar Hawaii using the BBB's name.

Review of Pro Solar Hawaii Court Case 1
Pro Solar Hawaii is now in a world of shi-!

I also can't help wondering if Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii bringing the BBB into a lawsuit will keep Ryan Thompson from ever having a business accredited with them ever again?  I can't believe the BBB is going to be too happy to hear that a formerly accredited business is suing them for what they posted to their website.  Truth be told, I truly and honestly do hope that Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii does not decide to drop his case instead of trying to bring the BBB into their  frivolous lawsuit.  It's worth every penny to me just to watch Ryan Thompson in court.

I do have to admit in the spirit of transparency that not all my motions today were granted by the court. My "Motion of Defendant to Dismiss Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, or in the Alternative,  for a More Definitive Statement" was not granted at this point.  Please!  No pity party for me yet, thank you..

 I'm only guessing when I tell you the reason is, it would be moot because the case cannot be moved forward until the BBB is added as a Defendant.  That does not mean it will not be granted later. Pro Solar Hawaii may just decide costs and time are going to be outside their comfort zone.  I do beg them to continue, I really do.  I still have many other things for this case up my sleeve.   I'll bet this case will make one from the TV show LA Law look like a small claims court case from BFE. :)

That is the Review of Pro Solar Hawaii court case. I look forward to seeing just how Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii  decides they want to proceed.


Review of Pro Solar Hawaii Court Case 2

Thursday, August 2, 2018

Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii lawsuit update 2.0

Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii lawsuit update 2.0-1


Here is the Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii lawsuit update 2.0. Why 2.0 you ask? Well now, If you did not read the last post, you can find it here: Pro Solar Hawaii Lawsuit Update I did not post brief details of my response there. So, this is the 2.0 update with details missing in the last post.
Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii lawsuit update 2.0-2

My response filing, was really a very simple thing. It was basically asking for the same thing i asked for, and the judge ordered in the first place. I mean, "hello people!". In an effort to save everyone involved time in dealing with a case that has no evidence. My response filing is 3 motions. I have no need to respond in the case, there is no real evidence of me doing anything wrong.

 Of course that means appearing in court, again. That really does not bother me much. I get to watch Ryan Thompson squirm. This is something i'm sure i am going to enjoy many more times. As the plaintiff as well as my current defendant position.
Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii lawsuit update 2.0-4

One of the motions is a "motion of defendant to strike references to matters covered by rule 408". Rule 408, as i understand it, is basically a rule that says you can't introduce settlement offers as evidence in a case.  This is to get people to try to solve matters between them without going to court. If you could use offers of settlement as evidence, there would be people suing people for all kinds of crazy things. Exactly as i see Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii trying to do to me in this case to cover for the fact that his case is frivolous and not based on any real harm to him, to harass me.

The next is a "motion of defendant to dismiss amended complaint for failure to join necessary party".  Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii says in the complaint that Thomas Paddock CEO of Sound Research Corporation decided not to do business with him based on what the Better Business Beau posted to their website. You can't just sue someone for something they have absolutely no control over in any way. If Thomas Paddock CEO of Sound Research Corporation did read something on the BBB website. The BBB has to be sued also, not just me. Pro Solar Hawaii used to be an accredited business with the BBB... Used to be.

Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii lawsuit update 2.0-3
The final one is a "motion of defendant to dismiss amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or in the alternative for a more definite statement". This is the second time i have had to file this motion. But, because i don't see how, even after the judge ordering "a more definite statement" from Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii, there is a "more definite statement". I am forced to again ask a judge to order Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii to tell me exactly what is wrong that relief can be granted.

At this point if you have been following, it is very easy see how I believe that this is a frivolous lawsuit without any evidence, Still. How this is a reaction of fear on Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii's part that Karma's reaction to his extremely and profoundly defamatory publicly posted response to my Yelp review of him is going to ruin him. I posted about this here: Still problems with Pro Solar Hawaii! Give it a read.

Pro Solar Hawaii Lawsuit
Ok, That's it for... Hold on. I still have a burning question. I am still wondering if Pro Solar Hawaii is now Pro Solar Hawaii & Electrical Contracting? Is this a legal name change? If so, should not Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii now be suing me as Ryan Thompson dba Pro Solar Hawaii & Electrical Contracting? I'm going to put an effort into finding out.

Their website (Pro Solar Hawaii) says Pro Solar Hawaii. But links from there to Yelp, BBB, etc. websites with the name as "Pro Solar Hawaii & Electrical Contracting" Wonder why that is?